This is a statement from two of the people who wrote Florida's new education standards on slavery. In it they give several names of people to exemplify slaves who learned skills they applied later in life.
Let's go through the supposed truth of this list one by one.
The eighth name is Jupiter Hammon, listed as a fishing and shipping industry worker.
Jupiter is the FIRST name in the list so far who was actually a slave—all his life—and was a writer and poet. If he worked in that industry, it was in that capacity.
The tenth name is William Whipper, also listed as a fishing and industry worker.
William was born to an enslaved mother and her owner, but was born in 1804 in Pennsylvania, where the existing law made him free at birth. He was a businessman.
The 12th name is Elizabeth Keckley, listed as a seamstress.
Elizabeth was indeed a slave, and learned how to be a seamstress while a slave. But it was her enslaved mother who taught her how to do that, while her slavers raped her.
The whole list is ridiculous, but this one is breaking me.
The 13th name is James Thomas, listed as a tailor.
This is a little more complicated. James was born a slave, and had his freedom bought by his mother at age 6. But Tennessee law stipulated he would remain legally a slave until he left the state.
He worked as an apprentice >>
at a barbershop owned by another slave, and eventually opened his own barbershop. He worked as a barber, eventually gained his real freedom, and then in his later years he was a real estate investor. He was not a tailor.
The 14th name is Marietta Carter, listed as a tailor.
I cannot find any information on who this person was, there are literally no hits.
The 15th name is Betsey Stockton, listed as a teacher.
Betsey was born a slave, yes, and became an indentured servant around when she was became a teenager, to the same person. She probably did become literate while enslaved/in indentured servitude. However, she became a >>
teacher while on a missionary trip of her own after she was a fully free person.
The 16th name is Booker T. Washington, listed as a teacher.
Booker was born in 1856, nine years before the emancipation of slaves, and was illiterate through the entirety of his enslavement. He taught himself to read.
So taking stock @AlexLanfran, of all of the bull shit ("truth") you helped spread, of the 16 names in that statement:
– 9 were never enslaved
– 9 are listed in the wrong industry
– 13/14 didn't learn their skills by being slaves
– 1 was the white sister of George Washington
@AlexLanfran There is in fact abundant evidence in their life stories, in fact, that new skills were much more readily acquired as they got their freedom.
How you @AlexLanfran, or any of your fellow ghouls, look at yourself in the mirror when you wake up in the morning, I don't know.
I made a table summarizing the results.
@BostechLegal (I tried skimming the first to see if I could find Betty Washington Lewis. No luck, as you might imagine.)
@BostechLegal The first book has been scanned (but not fully digitized) and is available online here:
@OllieMcClellan @specter177 Unless I *really* missed any sarcasm you were laying down lol
@lookbryand They offered it to substantiate this piece:
"Instruction includes the trades of slaves (e.g., musicians, healers, blacksmiths, carpenters, shoemakers, weavers, tailors, sawyers, hostlers, silversmiths, cobblers, wheelwrights, wigmakers, milliners, painters, coopers)."
@lookbryand This is from your source, thank you.
Now, what exactly will appear in any textbooks or instruction, I do not know. I hope it's not any of the things in their statement. But it is not very encouraging when these two try to speak up and make fools of themselves.
@CPodiumcafe @nhannahjones In any case, most of the people on the list were (1) never slaves, and (2) not brought over from Africa, but were born in America.
POSSIBLE CORRECTION:
Like I said, John Henry is not a very well known historical figure, if not just a mere legend. However, if prison records Scott Nelson is correct about his findings of records, Henry might have been born in New Jersey, and been worked as a prison laborer.
Supposedly he was born in 1848, which would have placed his birth about 44 years after the passage of the 1804 Gradual Abolition Act, which held that if he was born to an enslaved mother, he would be free upon reaching 21 years of age. But it seems unlikely his mother would >>
be a slave and of child-bearing age, given how long that act had been in place. So, if John Henry existed and was born in New Jersey in 1848, he was probably a free man from birth, barring some other circumstance like parents being fugitive slaves—and in any case, he would be >>
enslaved in name only, not actually learning any skills through slavery.
So, we're going to adjust John Henry's information to "not ever enslaved" and "did not learn skills from slavery". At the same time, he may have only been on the railroads because of prison labor.
Sorry, that was a garbled sentence. Should read:
However, if Scott Nelson is correct about his findings of prison records, ...
As I think about it, the 13th Amendment carves out an exception for slavery specifically for punishment for crime, so maybe this is walking it back too far. Truth will be somewhere in the middle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I want to keep re-upping this thread because some main anti-trans people need to have their shit called out. We’ll start with the loser of Bailey v. Stonewall and founder of anti-trans hate group LGB Alliance, Allison Bailey.
As mentioned in the decision, Allison subscribes to this farcical conspiracy that young girls are being forced into “surgery to reassign their gender rather than admit to being a lesbian”, a claim she has repeated a couple times publicly on Twitter.
Not only is the rate at which young cis females identify as lesbian *higher than all other age groups*, it is currently *on the rise* even during this past year when transgender has been increasing as well. Young women are around more lesbian-identifying peers than ever before.
Are young people becoming trans in order to avoid the stigma of being gay? Lol. Lmao. No, they are not.
The Household Pulse Survey (HPS) has been collecting demographic information from adults across the US since the start of the pandemic. It is the first Census product which, since July last year, has been collecting information on gender identity (and sexual orientation).
The data can be found in the Public Use Files, which are individual-level files. Phase 3.2 is when gender identity was added.
The only reason anti-trans people say “social contagion” is because they want to invoke the idea of disease. That’s it.
The borrow from epidemiological studies was a random encounter modeling scheme where populations are assumed to be heavily mixed. It doesn’t even match the stated dynamic for ROGD or whatever, let alone most interpersonal dynamics where people adopt new beliefs or behaviors.
Cranks say “well it’s obvious there’s SOME social contagion effect” but what they really mean is “well it’s obvious there’s SOME social interaction”, which is at baseline true for any new belief or behavior adoption because we share language, so on.
The subsequent tweet, posted at the same time the original was and well before you ever QT'd it Jesse, was an excerpt from the very document showing the language which was used.
@jessesingal You're plainly wrong but it's not a surprise you make the mistake in this direction.
@jessesingal 1. On the one hand: Outness is not a broad allowance granted to someone to extend to others who aren't already in the know. Transgender people who are "out" often want to control how they expose that to others they do not know, precisely for safety reasons.
@jessesingal The Student Support Plan the district put together last year has does not define "open" or "out" in explicit terms, but it does implicitly, by reference to which options in the plan a student can forego selecting when filing it out.
Part of what makes airplanes expensive is the multiple redundancy required by regulations to protect consumer safety. And the Boeing 737 Max crashes highlight how companies will skirt even minor costs for critical safety components, and will intentionally lie to regulators.
Companies do not have the public's interest at heart, especially when it comes to public safety. That's why we have regulatory bodies that can employ the expertise and flexibility necessary to implement specific regulations and specific oversight for novel problems.
The route of forcing Congress to legislatively pass minutiae each time a regulation should be put into place doesn't balance the interests of public safety and corporate speed, it sacrifices the first entirely. This is more than just the FAA or EPA too, but OSHA.